Do we de-bias ourselves?: The impact of repeated presentation on the bat-and-ball problem

Abstract : The notorious bat-and-ball problem has long been used to demonstrate that people are easily biased by their intuitions. In this paper we test the robustness of biased responding by examining how it is affected by repeated problem presentation. Participants solved 50 standard and control versions of the bat-and-ball problem. To examine the nature of a potential learning effect we adopted a two-response paradigm in which participants have to give a first hunch and can afterwards take the time to deliberate and change their answer. Results showed that both people's first hunches and the responses they gave after deliberation predominantly remained biased from start to finish. But in the rare cases in which participants did learn to correct themselves, they immediately managed to apply the solution strategy and gave a correct hunch on the subsequent problems. We discuss critical methodological and theoretical implications.
Liste complète des métadonnées

Littérature citée [26 références]  Voir  Masquer  Télécharger

https://hal-descartes.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02104408
Contributeur : Matthieu Raoelison <>
Soumis le : vendredi 19 avril 2019 - 14:57:05
Dernière modification le : mercredi 8 mai 2019 - 01:43:47

Fichier

jdm181112.pdf
Fichiers éditeurs autorisés sur une archive ouverte

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : hal-02104408, version 1

Données associées

Citation

Matthieu Raoelison, Wim de Neys. Do we de-bias ourselves?: The impact of repeated presentation on the bat-and-ball problem. Judgment and Decision Making, 2019, 14 (2), pp.170 - 178. ⟨hal-02104408⟩

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de la notice

31

Téléchargements de fichiers

62